~Hystoriographia Linguistica~
Saturday, February 11, 2012
What inspires me...
Link to the blank meme: http://fav.me/d2vx881
So finally got round to this! Was heaps of fun and really got me thinking back to all my old influences and how I got to where I am, artistically. Just a couple things explaining them:
FANTASY: Opened up a world where I was actually good at drawing things...as opposed to still art, abstract art and all the other crap they teach you at school. One of the most influential artists who inspired me was Zindy Nielson: http://zindy-zone.dk/ . Her art taught me how to not be afraid of drawing naked girls, (lol) and also how to draw essential things like the perfect face, detailed hair and of course angel/ fairy wings :)
ARTISTS: Where would I be without other artists? Every great artist steals and grabs and pinches things from other people's art and makes it their own somehow.
BOOKS: I am constantly inspired by amazing characters and captivating storylines..Harry Potter of course (who WASN'T?) but also Phillip Pullman's characters and recently, Ender's Game and Hunger Games. (I didn't add them in the map because I haven't actually drawn much of their yet).
THE HUMAN BODY: My #1 source of inspiration...anyone who's seen my art can definitely vouch for that. There is nothing more pure and perfect than the human body. End of story.
COMICS: I remember one of the first pictures I was ever really proud of, was a tracing I did of MJ (Spiderman, for those lost souls who dont know) and ever since then have been a huge fan of comics. Archie especially influenced how I draw clothes haha...Veronica always had the sexiest clothes....
DISNEY ART: Always have been, and always will be a Disney fangirl. So it goes without saying that their art, alongside unbeatable romance and kickass leading women, would be a huge inlfuence.
NARNIA: The characters, the scenes and the story will forever leave an imprint on my art.
PAULINE BAYNES: No words...just wow. (Most famous for illustrating The Chronicles of Narnia and Lord of the Rings)
TV SHOWS: These have always been a part of my life since Powerpuff Girls and Swatcats...then Dark Angel, One tree Hill, Heroes and Lost. In my teen years I drew very heavily from Peyton Sawyer's drawing style, and also from Tim Sale's art in Heroes.
FASHION: This may have been the original thing that got me drawing. When I was 8 years old I started designing clothes and drawing them on paperdoll templates...then I decided I wanted my mannequins to have hands and faces...and it went from there!
GRAPHIC NOVELS: I'm actually a Marvel fan, but DC's Vertigo Comics have some amazing art that I cant help but admire, mainly Sandman and Fables. It's a must read for anyone who likes comics.
ANIME: I love the look of anime, but havent really read/watched much of it myself apart from Inuyasha, which I loved, and have been since trying to incorporate it into my art.
ANIMORPHS: OMG where to start...Andalites have gotta be one of those most fun fantasy creatures to draw!!! ahghgh can't say more or this blurb will never end.
EMOTION: Last but not least, Pain - Love - Happiness...anything really, can inspire. The stronger the feelings, the better and more original the art.
For those who actually read all of this and made it to the end...congrats! Now you basically know everything interesting there is to know about me..:P
*things I couldn't fit in: Shakespeare, MUSIC! Beautiful women, Nature, Spirituality...and heaps more.
http://alltheway96.deviantart.com/#/d4pf1ji
Labels:
art,
books,
cs lewis,
fables,
fantasy,
fashion,
interesting shit,
narnia,
neil gaiman,
sandman,
vertigo comics
| Reactions: |
Sunday, February 5, 2012
Spin-offs need to spin off!
More spin-offs from Vertigo?
As if Fables doesn't have enough with Cinderella, Jack of Fables, 1001 Nights of Snowfall, and now Werewolves of the heartland and Fairest.
I understand the need to keep producing comics and perhaps stir more interest in Fables itself, but to be honest, Fables sells itself just fine. Anyone who reads comics or Graphic Novels has either heard of it, read of it, or is in love with it.

The first issue of Cinderella (the second one will be released in April) was good, but not spectacular. It has some potential though, the idea of the 'baddass female faerie-tale' has taken quite a hit with Hollywood , and I predict it will continue in its popularity. The soon to be released Snow White and the Huntsman and ABS's new show Once Upon a Time both tossed aside the frail and fragile damsel in distress image for a more independent and kick-ass one, much like Cindy's spy role in Fables.

I personally did not enjoy Jack of Fables, I found it predictable and boring. Jack's so called witty ingeniousness coupled with his absolute lack of regard for anyone but himself makes for great reading when thrown into Fables. But without any other three dimensional characters for support, Jack of Fables fell miserably low in my opinion.

1001 Nights of Snowfall was by far the best, and I don't even think it should be categorized under spin-offs. It should be labelled as a prequel or 'origins piece' or something similar. The artwork alone is spectacular and includes pieces from Tara Mcpherson, one of my personal favourite illustrators, and of course Bucky* himself.
And now Werewolves of the heartland coming out in November. Hopefully it's more promising than the previous ones. I appreciated how they created and honed the Bigby story, so I would like to see where they go with that.
I say invest more time with current issues and less time trying to be innovative and make more money. At the moment issues come out every six months, which is quite a wait for regular readers. That said, I cant wait to see the latest installment: "Fairest" featuring Sleeping Beauty, Cindy, Snow, Red and Rapunzul...and perhaps more. This looks like something I would want to read, and hopefully other Fables fans agree. As long as they keep the art spectacular, and the story better than the other spin-off attempts, it will be a hit.
*Mark Buckingham: Illustrator: (Sandman, Fables, Spiderman, Xanadu...to name a few). He is the Morgan Freeman of comic illustrators.
As if Fables doesn't have enough with Cinderella, Jack of Fables, 1001 Nights of Snowfall, and now Werewolves of the heartland and Fairest.
I understand the need to keep producing comics and perhaps stir more interest in Fables itself, but to be honest, Fables sells itself just fine. Anyone who reads comics or Graphic Novels has either heard of it, read of it, or is in love with it.
The first issue of Cinderella (the second one will be released in April) was good, but not spectacular. It has some potential though, the idea of the 'baddass female faerie-tale' has taken quite a hit with Hollywood , and I predict it will continue in its popularity. The soon to be released Snow White and the Huntsman and ABS's new show Once Upon a Time both tossed aside the frail and fragile damsel in distress image for a more independent and kick-ass one, much like Cindy's spy role in Fables.
I personally did not enjoy Jack of Fables, I found it predictable and boring. Jack's so called witty ingeniousness coupled with his absolute lack of regard for anyone but himself makes for great reading when thrown into Fables. But without any other three dimensional characters for support, Jack of Fables fell miserably low in my opinion.
1001 Nights of Snowfall was by far the best, and I don't even think it should be categorized under spin-offs. It should be labelled as a prequel or 'origins piece' or something similar. The artwork alone is spectacular and includes pieces from Tara Mcpherson, one of my personal favourite illustrators, and of course Bucky* himself.
And now Werewolves of the heartland coming out in November. Hopefully it's more promising than the previous ones. I appreciated how they created and honed the Bigby story, so I would like to see where they go with that.
I say invest more time with current issues and less time trying to be innovative and make more money. At the moment issues come out every six months, which is quite a wait for regular readers. That said, I cant wait to see the latest installment: "Fairest" featuring Sleeping Beauty, Cindy, Snow, Red and Rapunzul...and perhaps more. This looks like something I would want to read, and hopefully other Fables fans agree. As long as they keep the art spectacular, and the story better than the other spin-off attempts, it will be a hit.
*Mark Buckingham: Illustrator: (Sandman, Fables, Spiderman, Xanadu...to name a few). He is the Morgan Freeman of comic illustrators.
Labels:
books,
fables,
interesting shit,
Reviews,
vertigo comics
| Reactions: |
Thursday, October 27, 2011
Developmental Dyscalculia? Well this just explains everything...
Developmental dyscalculia, or better known as "I-hate-anything-math-related syndrome", has actually been determined as a specific learning disability affecting the normal acquisition of arithmetic skills!!!!!
It's actually a thing!
Now it makes so much sense... ever since grade school I was always quite 'mathematically challenged' to put it lightly, and was always told I just wasn't applying myself. Environmental causes were not necessarily at fault here as I had well established Brittish and American schooling and my classmates all did fine.
Now, to avoid self diagnosis and bring down the wrath of all psychologists everywhere, I did some snooping and found two exceptional studies from the Journal of Child Neurology , and PLoS ONE going over the finer details and correlated factors. Give them a quick scan if you're still not convinced.
So to all you 'mathematically challenged' folk out there - all is not lost! You're not stupid, you could just have a debilitating brain disorder instead! ......
Wait, what?
....
Disclaimer: I now have to do and understand Statistics almost everyday for my degree, so I guess you can grow out of it...
It's actually a thing!
Now it makes so much sense... ever since grade school I was always quite 'mathematically challenged' to put it lightly, and was always told I just wasn't applying myself. Environmental causes were not necessarily at fault here as I had well established Brittish and American schooling and my classmates all did fine.
Now, to avoid self diagnosis and bring down the wrath of all psychologists everywhere, I did some snooping and found two exceptional studies from the Journal of Child Neurology , and PLoS ONE going over the finer details and correlated factors. Give them a quick scan if you're still not convinced.
So to all you 'mathematically challenged' folk out there - all is not lost! You're not stupid, you could just have a debilitating brain disorder instead! ......
Wait, what?
....
Disclaimer: I now have to do and understand Statistics almost everyday for my degree, so I guess you can grow out of it...
Labels:
interesting shit,
musings,
psychology
| Reactions: |
Saturday, October 15, 2011
Lucifer Morningstar
"Mortals - why do they blame me for all their litle failings?
They use my name as if I spend my entire day sitting on their shoulders, forcing them to commit
acts they would otherwise find repulsive.
'The Devil made me do it.'
I have never made one of them do anything. Never. They live their own tiny lives, I do not live their lives for them.
They die, and they come here [Hell] – having transgressed against what they believed to be right – and expect us to fulfill their desire for pain and retribution. I don’t make them come here… I need no souls. And how can anyone own a soul? No, they belong to themselves. They just hate to have to face up to it."
- LUCIFER: The Sandman: Season of Mists (Neil Gaiman)
*********************************
Honestly, I love Neil Gaiman for quotes like this. The whole idea is something that I always
mused over - and here it is in literary flesh. It's so beautifully controversial, and yet true at
the same time. Whatever religeon you may have, it's hard to beleive that someone's sole
purpose in life is to piss people off and 'lead them into sin'. Sure, it may be fun after the first
100 thousand years, but then it may start getting a tad tedious, don't you reckon?
Labels:
books,
fantasy,
interpretations,
neil gaiman,
sandman,
vertigo comics
| Reactions: |
Thursday, October 13, 2011
Holding out for a hero: FABLES Vol. 16
Fables Vol. 16: Super Group -released on December 13, 2011.
It seems like I have been waiting for this latest installment of fantastic writing & art for far too long! The last one, Vol. 15: Rose Red, was released almost 6 months ago (April 11, 2011). This seems like reason enough for a general uproar from the Fables fan community, but taking into account that the first issue was released in 2003 and this is a fairly new series, I should probably stop complaining. Here's some sneak peeks of some of the pre-released artwork by the amazing Mark Buckingham (my personal art idol after Pauline Baynes and Waterhouse) and Joao Ruas' phenomenal cover artwork.
![]() |
| Issue #104 - cover |
![]() |
| Issue #102 - inside peek |
I don't know how I feel about Vertigo going back to it's DC roots and opting for the 'superhero' look for this entire volume, but as with everything Fable -variety has always been a predeterminer to their success as a series. Regarding the theme, the editor Shelly Bond said:
“My initial reaction was probably similar to yours: WTF?!?! But then Bill offered up an explanation. It’s a sendup to 1950 comic books – sort of. In classic Willingham style, Bill wanted to do a storyline that was nothing that any Fables fan could see coming…what else could you do post 101 issues but give readers something truly unexpected? But trust me–it’s more than Ozma’s big idea to form a super team to ward off evil powers…there are relationship troubles galore involving Beauty and the Beast and their new bundle of joy (?), Snow White and Bigby and even some reappearances by characters long forgotten and abhorred.”
Personally, I can't wait to see what this volume holds regarding the storyline - regardless what they're
wearing. And I'm sure no one will say no to seeing Bigby and Charming in some latex ( I would
include Cindy in that, but she seems to wear form-fitting latex and boots as casual spy attire anyway).
December can't come soon enough.
Labels:
books,
fables,
interesting shit,
Reviews,
vertigo comics
| Reactions: |
Saturday, October 1, 2011
A Midsummer Night’s Dream: Helena's Lament
|
| A Midsummer Night’s Dream: Act One, sc. 1, lines 232-251 |
Helena's Lament: Close analysis
Love is a common theme seen in many plays and A Midsummer Night’s
Dream is no exception. William Shakespeare uses it as one of the central themes to the
plot alongside seeing and blindness, deception and trickery. In the passage chosen, the
effects and repercussions of some of these themes will be discussed, in relation to the
rest of the play. Shakespeare also uses literary tools to create a certain poetic flow to his
writing, and these too will be divulged.
In Helena’s mournful and self-pitying lament, there are ten rhyming pairs of verse in
iambic pentameter(1). These couplets add to the dramatic effect by presenting a constant
sound and rhythm which is synonymous to Helena’s relentless devotion to Demetrius.
These couplets help to portray that effect. The use of reversed syntax should be also
noted, as it emphasizes certain words and gives Helena’s speech a distinctive sound (2).
An example of this can be seen when Shakespeare puts the object before the subject
and verb, “Things base and vile, holding no quantity, / Love can transpose to form
and dignity” (ll. 238-9). This not only enables the iambic pentameter and the rhyme
to continue, but puts emphasis on the words ‘quantity’ and ‘dignity’. These words are
important because they refer to Helena’s love for Demetrius as being out of proportion
to his faults and containing no self-respect for herself.
There are many themes presented in the play, and one of the most glaring is ‘seeing
and blindness’ which is mentioned five times through this particular passage. The
first and second is where Demetrius is “doting on Hermia’s eyes” (l. 236), and where
he “looked on Hermia’s eyne” (l. 248). This is worth noting because it is Demetrius’s
eyes that are blurred by Oberon’s nectar, yet it is twice mentioned that Hermia’s
eyes are enchanting enough to sway Demetrius’s heart. The third reference talks of
how “Love looks not with the eyes but with the mind” (l. 240), which is ironic because
that is explicitly where Oberon tells Puck to place the nectar; so that the Athenian will
love the first thing they see. Hence, in this instance, love does see with the eyes. The
fourth reference, in the same couplet, states that “winged cupid [is] painted blind” (l.
241) which infers that love is blind to everything. This is seen in multiple pairings
throughout the text, as with Titania and Bottom (3), Helena and Demetrius, Demetrius
and Hermia. The fifth and last reference to seeing and blindness is perhaps the most
important. It declares that love has “Wings, and no eyes, figure unheedy haste” (l. 243).
The insinuation here is that loving someone without truly seeing them is as pointless
and dangerous as flying without the ability to see. ‘Unheedy’ and ‘haste’ are two words
that strongly negate each other, yet when put in this context they are used to illustrate
this impossible situation.
There are some interesting examples of imagery and vocabulary scattered throughout
the passage, all with distinctive connotations and inferences. One of the key ones is the
image of Cupid, the personification of love itself. He is depicted as a blind young boy
with wings, toting a quiver of love-inducing arrows. The significance of this is to show
that love is as folly-some, easily swayed and inconstant as a child. "So the boy love
is perjured everywhere" (l. 247) simply means that he is falsely depicted as a bringer
of love, but she is implying that his presence is more deceptive and not so joyous.
Trickery and deception is a recurrent theme in A Midsummer Night's Dream; the play is
full of characters that seem to be one thing and yet are another. A few examples of this
can be seen in the Meta-theatricality of the plays within the play, and also with Bottom
appearing as a donkey to Titania.
An interesting use of vocabulary is when Helena likens Demetrius’s display of love
for her, to hail. Hail is cold and harsh and not usually associated with romantic love,
as is the sun for instance. Nevertheless, Helena uses this particular word which could
be a hint that his love is not true. In addition, his "showers of oaths did melt" (l. 251)
when "some heat from Hermia's [he] felt" (l. 250) which proposes that Demetrius's love
for Hermia is more concrete.
The passage also illustrates aspects of Helena's character that need to be presented in
order to enhance the understanding of the rest of the play. At the start of the passage
she cries “How happy some o'er other some can be” (l. 232), which can only be
translated as a bout of whining self-pity. The next line is equally indulgent, showing
her jealous nature with a hint of pride “Through Athens I am thought as fair as she. /
But what of that? Demetrius thinks not so” (ll. 233-4). This would be a harsh judgement
of her character from a mere two lines, but she continues to talk and act this way
throughout the rest of Act 1 and into Act 2 (4). Therefore, the passage reveals Helena's
role in the play as the neglected pursuer who eventually gets her desires (through no
credit to her). It also engages the audience to decide whether they either feel pity or
contempt for Helena as the beaten, yet still fawning spaniel (Act 2, sc.1, l. 211).
Helena's colourful lament, though it may deviate from the point at times, has a clear
underlying message: Love is unjust, dangerous, inconstant, and folly some. This then poses
the question; if all love is futile, what of her 'love' for Demetrius? If that is her interpretation
of how love can be, then how is her love any more legitimate than his? If his inconstancy
towards her is purely because all love is inconstant, then he cannot be blamed for it.
Despite these conundrums, her monologue advances the plot by addressing the larger themes
that repeatedly appear later in the play. The themes of love, sight and deception are scattered
throughout the play, and are given an adequate introduction in this passage of Helena’s
lament.
**********************************************************************************
1. These are known as ‘heroic couplets’.
2. Here Shakespeare uses his trademark of changing the conventional order of the subjects, objects
and verbs in a sentence. Despite making the meaning of the sentence less clear, this method creates a
poetic effect.
3. This pairing is a product of magic, whereas the other two are natural.
4. After Act 2, magic intervenes and she is pursued by both Lysander and Demetrius. Thus her self pity
turns into low self-esteem and she accuses their love for mockery.
turns into low self-esteem and she accuses their love for mockery.
| Reactions: |
Saturday, July 23, 2011
My thoughts on The Voyage of the Dawn Treader - the BOOK not the movie.
The Voyage of the Dawn Treader is one of the more interesting books of C.S Lewis's seven book series, mainly because of the theme of an epic journey. It raises many interesting issues that were not seen in the previous written books. Many litarary analysts over time have attempted to address or interpret these themes and issues. Colin Manlove is one of these, a reknowned literary critic on numerous fantasy works including those of J.R.R Tolkien, a friend and mentor of Lewis's. Manlove makes a statement about this particular book, which is the third book in the series when taken in order of publication, and the fifth book in chronological order. When referring to the books here, publication order will be considered to lessen any confusion. Also, only the books that relate directly to the Pevensie children will be mentioned in depth. Magician's Nephew and Horse and His Boy are not as relevant to the topics being discussed. Colin Manlove makes many notable observations in his statement about The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, and also a few debatable claims. These will all be addressed in the order stated.
Firstly, Manlove states that growth and expansion is a structural pattern in each of the books. This is undeniably true. Each book delves more deeply into important issues in life. If the publication order of reading is to be considered, this is definitely true. Starting with The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe, the focus begins with introducing Narnia and Aslan. This enables the Pevensie children and the readers to widen their minds to other realities and possibilities, as a staring point to prepare them for the rest of their adventures. Then in Prince Caspian, a more subtle plot of belief without seeing is introduced, which requires further proof of their faith – and not all of them succeed. Peter and Susan take the longest to believe that Aslan is with them without seeing him, and act more grown up than they are. This new development in their characters insinuates that they are getting too old for Narnia, so when Aslan confirms this at the end of the book it is not that much of a surprise. Then with The Voyage of the Dawn Treader the monumental task of facing temptations growing into adults is required. The charactes have to discover themselves and decide what kind of people they want to grow to be. In the following books the new characters (because the Pevensie's are no longer part of the immediate storyline until the end in The Last Battle) must face even larger problems, and grow and expand their capablities much more to achieve their goals. In The Silver Chair must undertake the impossible task of rescuing Prince Rillian with only a few clues and Jill is tested more than any other charcter while on their first trip to Narnia. Then in The Last Battle she and Eustace go through the worst ordeal ever seen in the books – they must watch their friends and comrades die around them in battle and the destruction of all that is good in the old Narnia. The readers go through the stages together with all the characters, which is key to the whole Narnian experience. So, there is in fact a clear structure of growth and expansion in each of the books.
Next, Colin briefly summarizes that the point of the book is that it is a “journey out from Narnia to discover Aslan's far country”. This is a very general description and it slightly takes away from the real point of the story. Yes, the primary reason for the physical 'journey' is to indeed seek Aslan's country (and the seven lost Lords), but a more subtext and far more important reason is the journey of maturing, and growing up. That also is a very generalised notion, so each character's personal journey to maturity needs to be addressed separately. For Caspian, the journey is about accepting his leadership role as king, and understand that personal needs, like his desire to travel to the end of the world and forfeit his crown, must come second to his duty to Narnia. This physical journey quenches some of his thirst for adventure and glory so that he can return to Narnia and be king without any unfullfiled needs. For Edmund and Lucy the journey is more about coming to terms that they need to be able to live in their world without Aslan and Narnia, and creating a sense of self and identity on their own. For Lucy in particular, it is about discovering what kind of woman she wants to become; she faces unresolved issues like her jealousy of Susan and how she sees herself. Edmund's journey is about facing deep personal issues he has had since his first encounter in Narnia – namely, his problems with always being 'second in command'. This comes to light on Deathwater island in his duel with Caspian. For Eustace, the journey has quite a differerent effect. It prepares him for his future encounters with Narnia, and simultaneously sparks his need for more of it. This is seen in the beginning of The Silver Chair where at the first sign of trouble or difficulty he calls on Aslan. The school semester had barely begun and he was so changed that he couldn't stand it even for a brief time. The only character for whom finding Aslan's country is a primary goal is Reepicheep and he acheives that goal, most probably because of that reason. Therefore, The Voyage of the Dawn Treader is about much more than a “long sea jouney”, and more about each characters personal journey.
Another questionable claim of Manlove's is that previous books in the series display Aslan's 'nearness' more than in The Voyage of the Dawn Treader. This is simply not true, in Prince Caspian Aslan is far more distant and unreachable. Aslan does make more physical appearances inPrice Caspian than in The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, but he is much more present in spirit and more supportive in the latter. In The Voyage of the Dawn Treader he appears at will when characters need him (with Eustace at Dragon Island) or temptation (with Lucy in Coriakin's house, and Caspian at the end of the world), but also when he is called. There is a clear example of this when Lucy calls him for help when all hope is lost in Dark Island. In Price Caspian he does not come when called, in fact he does quite the opposite, which is part of the theme of needing to believe in him whithout seeing him. It goes without saying that in The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe, Aslan is undoubtedly shown to be the 'nearest' in comparison with all the other books. He gives physical support in the battle, emotional support to each character, and most importantly, shows his vunerability to Lucy and Susan. So The Voyage of the Dawn Treader is not the book which explores Aslan's 'distance' the most. However, the second part of Manlove's statement is quite accurate; he says that the book is about going from “the known world to the wholly 'other' ”. This applies to all the characters as well as the readers, for none of them have ever been to that part of Narnia before.
The next issue that is addressed is the significance of the seven islands that the Dawn Treader sails to. Manlove's opinion that each island is an “image of the cut-off self and of evil or delusion” is perhaps too harsh an analysis. It does not correctly describe all the islands, except perhaps for Dark Island and Deathwater Island. There are islands where the characters go through both positive and negetive experiances. The negetive ones are more about facing temptaions and conquering fears than 'evill or delusion'. The first one that is travelled to is The Lone Islands, and perhaps here is the only emphasis on the 'cut-off' self. The inhabitants are under Narnian law, but are not currently following their rules and customs, so they need to be brought back to it. Dragon Island is primarily about facing the temptaion of greed, for Eusctace. It also brings about a change in him that is needed for the rest of the journey, and his future journeys in Narnia. Burnt Island has the illusion of being about nothing, because there is nothing there, but it could be argued that the mystery represents the unknown part of life, or the part that is yet to be written. None of these first islands are even remotely to do with the black-and-white concpet of 'evil'. In Deathwater Island there is some presence of evil, but mostly it is the darkness within Caspian and Edmund that creates the problem. There is greed and hunger for power within all of us, and these characters are no exception. The next island is the Land of the Duffers, and this explores temptations for Lucy. This is the part of her journey where she is presented with a scenario where she has to decide what kind of person she wants to be. She is tempted twice, and fails once. This is part of the recurrant theme of maturing and growing that is seen repetively in the book. In Dark Island, there is a definite presense of 'evil', which is ulimately conquered, but has no obvious source. The last island is Ramandu's Island, which is merely a resting place and a crossroads. Then as they draw near to the end of the world, there is no evil or delusion, but simply more temptations. Caspian is tempted to break his vow to the crew, to his country and even to Ramandu's daughter. The only thing that can shake him out of it, is Aslan himslef. So, the islands are not merely an image of all that is bad, but once again about maturing and moving onto the next stages of life.
The last thing Manlove mentions is that the Dawn Treader is “moving ever onward...an image of the growing spirit”, which is the perfect description of it. The ship does represent life, and the growing spirit in many ways. It goes through storms and trials, adventures and acheivements. But it keeps moving forwards regardless of all this. As the characters grew and matured through their voyage, so does the human spirit through its voyage through life.
Colin Manlove's description of The Voyage of the Dawn Treader may not have been completely accurate or precise on a few accounts, but it does give a general picture of what the book is about. Analysing works of fantasy is not an easy feat, especially when it is set in a world so different from our own. Narnia is a world where epic journeys occur, and characters grow, mature, and discover themselves far better than they could in their own world. As C.S. Lewis himself aptly stated, “If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world.”
Labels:
books,
cs lewis,
fantasy,
literature,
narnia,
the voyage of the dawn treader
| Reactions: |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











